المجلة الجزائرية للمخطوطات
Volume 22, Numéro 1, Pages 642-659
2026-06-07
Authors : Benhamlaoui Lamine .
This study compares oral conferencing versus written corrective feedback (WCF) for improving surface-level accuracy in EFL writing. Using a quasi-experimental design, 40 Algerian undergraduate students received either one-on-one oral conferencing or traditional written feedback over 14 weeks. Pre- and post-tests assessed capitalization, articles, punctuation, and conditionals. Results showed the oral conferencing group achieved 47% error reduction compared to 28% for written feedback, with pronounced advantages in complex structures (conditionals) and rule internalization (capitalization). Grounded in Interactionist SLA, Cognitive Load Theory, and Sociocultural Theory, findings suggest oral conferencing's dialogic nature enhances "noticing," reduces cognitive load through scaffolding, and enables immediate meaning negotiation—mechanisms absent in static written commentary. The study challenges the "red pen" paradigm and advocates integrating dialogic feedback modalities in EFL instruction.
Oral Conferencing ; Written Corrective Feedback ; EFL Writing ; Surface-level Accuracy ; Feedback Modality
Zidani Soraya
.
Bahloul Amel
.
pages 341-358.
Laarous Meriem
.
Merrouche Sarah
.
pages 543-559.
Benmadani Sara
.
Djafri Leila
.
pages 569-586.
Babou Amina
.
pages 949-963.