العمدة في اللسانيات وتحليل الخطاب
Volume 10, Numéro 1, Pages 108-131
2026-01-25
Authors : Mohamed El-amine Kahloula . Linda Belabdelouahab -fernini .
This article examines the post-9/11 American reinterpretation of Barbary corsairs as proto-terrorists and argues that this shift reflects the political demands of the War on Terror rather than historical continuity. While nineteenth-century U.S. encounters with the North African regencies were shaped by commercial disputes, diplomatic negotiations, and evolving conceptions of maritime sovereignty, post-2001 political and popular discourse selectively retrojects the category of “terrorism” onto these early encounters. This reframing obscures the legal and structural similarities between Barbary corsairing which is in reality a systematic, state-sanctioned maritime strategy and European privateering, while amplifying cultural and religious differences to construct a timeless “Muslim threat.” This study attempts to demonstrate how encounters with Barbary have been instrumentalized to legitimize and justify the past two decades military interventions and immigration restrictions. The article concludes by exploring the consequences of this historical distortion for both scholarly understanding and public policy.
Barbary corsairing; ; War on Terror ; Proto-terrorism ; Post-9/11 ; American reinterpretation ; Political and popular discourse
Mokhtari Walid
.
pages 79-87.
Djaboub Ammar
.
Lahouel Mourad
.
pages 204-220.
Bouchagra Reda
.
Maoui Hocine
.
pages 1777-1791.
سي كبير أحمد التجاني
.
ص 593-602.
Charchar Karima
.
Toulgui Ladi
.
pages 828-849.