مجلة التمكين الاجتماعي
Volume 8, Numéro 4, Pages 98-139
2026-10-31

From Automation To Educational Value: A Conceptual Framework For Human–ai Co-learning In Education



Authors : Gupta Rohit . Gupta Rahul .

Abstract

The rapid expansion of artificial intelligence (AI) in education has increased the availability of personalized learning, intelligent tutoring, generative feedback, and automated instructional support. However, technological capability does not necessarily translate into educational value. This conceptual study addresses the question: Under what pedagogical, human, and institutional conditions does AI capability translate into educational value? A critical conceptual synthesis of research on AI-supported personalization, intelligent tutoring, generative AI, cognitive engagement, learner and teacher agency, reliability, equity, and learning authenticity was undertaken. The analysis distinguishes AI capability from educational value and identifies five dimensions through which AI-supported education can be evaluated: personalization, reliability, human agency, equity, and learning authenticity. Based on these dimensions, the study develops a Human–AI Co-Learning Framework (HACLF) comprising six interconnected layers- learner, AI assistant, teacher, learning environment, governance, and society- and proposes the AI Education Value Index (AEVI) as a conceptual evaluation framework. The conceptual synthesis indicates that the educational consequences of AI are conditional on how technological capabilities are pedagogically integrated and mediated by human judgment, verification practices, equitable access, and authentic learner participation. The study contributes an education-centred perspective that shifts evaluation from what AI can automate to the conditions under which AI can support meaningful learning. HACLF and AEVI provide a basis for future empirical research and validation of AI-supported educational practices.

Keywords

Artificial intelligence in education; Generative AI; Human–AI co-learning; Educational value; Learner agency; Teacher agency; Learning authenticity; AI literacy; Educational equity.

Les articles similaires

أهمية التعليم الالكتروني في ضمان استمرارية العملية التعليمية في ظل كوفيد 19. -تجارب دولية وتحديات- The Importance Of E-learning In Ensuring The Continuity Of The Educational Process In Light Of Covid 19 -international Experiences And Challenges- أهمية التعليم الالكتروني في ضمان استمرارية العملية التعليمية في ظل كوفيد 19. -تجارب دولية وتحديات- The Importance Of E-learning In Ensuring The Continuity Of The Educational Process In Light Of Covid 19 -international Experiences And Challenges- أهمية التعليم الالكتروني في ضمان استمرارية العملية التعليمية في ظل كوفيد 19. -تجارب دولية وتحديات- The Importance Of E-learning In Ensuring The Continuity Of The Educational Process In Light Of Covid 19 -international Experiences And Challenges

بوجيت مليكة . 
ص 316-331.

تمثلات الفاعلون التربويون للمشكلة القيمية بالإصلاح التربوي للمنظومة التربوية الجزائرية (دراسة تحليلية لمحتوى الرسالة الإعلامية للفاعلين التربويين) Educational Actors’ Representations Of The Value Problem Concerning The Educational Reform Of The Algerian Educational System (analytical Study Of The Media Message Content Of Educational Actors)

بوطورة حنان .  منصوري سميرة . 
ص 377-399.

A Conceptual Framework For Integrating Sustainable Development Goals In Efl Education: Bridging Language Learning And Global Citizenship In Algerian Higher Education

Fadel Houda . 
pages 130-148.

التّعلّم الذّاتيّ واقتصاد المعرفة: ومقتضيات تجديد الممارسة التّعليميّة التّعلّميّة دراسة تقييميّة لتجربة الجزائر في ربط التّعلّم الذّاتيّ بالتّعليم الإلكترونيّ Self-learning And The Knowledge Economy: And And The Requirements For Renewing Educational And Learning Practice An Evaluation Study Of The Algerian Experience Of Relating Self-learning With Electronic Learning.

مشاط سامية . 
ص 266-286.

Digital Ecosystems And Sme Competitiveness: A Conceptual Framework For Value Creation, Integration, And Policy Support

Bouklia Nawel .  Touitou Mohammed . 
pages 667-688.

Formats de citation