AL-MUTARĞIM المترجم
Volume 24, Numéro 2, Pages 57-79
2025-12-31
Authors : Senkadi Abdelkader .
The Holy Quran, as the divine revelation in Arabic, is distinguished by its unparalleled linguistic precision, rhetorical depth, and lexical richness. Among its most intricate linguistic features is the use of synonyms (tarāduf) and near-synonyms—terms that may appear interchangeable but often carry subtle theological, contextual, or stylistic distinctions. This study examines the nuanced distinctions between near-synonymous Qur’anic terms—ʿilm vs. maʿrifah and kufr vs. shirk through a comparative analysis of three prominent English translations.By analyzing lexical choices and contextual interpretations, this paper highlights theological and semantic implications in translation, contributing to discussions on Islamic terminology and exegesis. Following a textual comparative analysis background, the researcher aims at answering the following question: How can translators effectively render Quranic near-synonyms while preserving their linguistic, theological, and rhetorical nuances in target languages?; having as a hypothesis that a failure to differentiate between Quranic synonyms may lead to doctrinal ambiguities or misinterpretations of the versus of the Holy Word of Allah.
Qur’an, near-synonyms, translation , Ilm vs Ma’rifah, Kufr vs Shirk.
بوسالم أحلام
.
عابد يوسف
.
ص 117-132.
Yahia Zeghoudi
.
pages 74-88.
غالم رمضان
.
بشير باي محمد
.
ص 45-58.
Boukli-hacene Abdou-essamad Sadreddine Reda
.
Benhattab Abdelkader Lotfi
.
pages 506-516.