مجلة معهد العلوم الإقتصادية
Volume 28, Numéro 2, Pages 573-599
2025-12-19
Comparing The Performance Of Algerian Public Banks Using Multi-criteria Decision-making Methods
Authors : Djeddi Youcef . Bouamama Abd Ellah .
Abstract
Economic investors are constantly interested in analyzing banks' financial performance, which is essential for guiding their investment decisions. In this paper, we employ Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) techniques—specifically the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and the Combined Compromise Solution (CoCoSo) method—to evaluate the financial performance of Algerian public banks based on multiple criteria derived from financial ratios. The AHP method is applied to determine the relative importance (weights) of the evaluation criteria, whereas the CoCoSo method is employed to rank the banks based on their overall performance. To our knowledge, this study is the first to combine AHP and CoCoSo for a comparative analysis of banking performance, as well as to apply these methods to the evaluation of Algerian public banks based on financial ratio criteria. Experimental results showed that the best-performing bank was BADR, followed by CPA, while BEA came last.
Keywords
Bank financial performance analysis ; Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) methods ; AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) ; CoCoSo (Combined Compromise Solution) ; Algerian Public Banks
Les articles similaires
Sudhir Bhaskarrao Gayake
.
Atul K. Desai
.
Sunil Y. Kute
.
pages 143-154.
Zediri Ali
.
Moulay Lakhdar Abderrazak
.
Benkhettou Farid
.
pages 355-370.
دريدي أحلام
.
قشوط إلياس
.
مغزي لعرافي راضية
.
ص 718-736.
Yousfi Imane
.
Rasha Imane
.
pages 182-204.
