مجلة الاجتهاد القضائي
Volume 18, Numéro 2, Pages 561-582
2026-10-31
A Legal Analysis Of The Canadian Model: Enacting One Regulation Versus Repealing Two — Lessons From Regulatory Bargaining For The Development Of Minab City
Authors : Sadeghi Mohammad . Rouzbehi Fazlolah .
Abstract
Nowadays, increasing regulation, conflicts, and complexities are known as some of the important obstacles to city development. Canadian governance can control the extension of these obstacles by executing deregulation models and simplifying rules by the name of “removing two regulations to execute one regulation. “This means that by executing a new law, two recent laws should be removed or modified. Minab town is faced with similar obstacles in its development. Based on that, this study analyzed the model of “removing two-to-one situations” in Canada's theoretical framework and legal system. The aim was to remove these obstacles for Minab town. Achievements, extending the execution of deregulation models and simplifying the “removing two-to-one situation” laws of Canada, preventing extra regulation, reducing regulation in economic fields, and modifying ownership systems are suggested.
Keywords
Deregulation, Simplification, City development ; Two to one model in regulation
Les articles similaires
بوسالم أحلام
.
عابد يوسف
.
ص 117-132.
Yahia Zeghoudi
.
pages 74-88.
Said Houari Amel
.
pages 257-268.
